ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To explore the causes of hypothermia in patients undergoing transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy. 【Methods】 A total of 170 patients who underwent transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy in our hospital during Sep.2020 and May 2021 were prospectively enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into normal body temperature group (n=143) and hypothermia group (n=27), based on whether perioperative hypothermia happened. The clinical data were analyzed to evaluate the risk factors of hypothermia. 【Results】 Univariate analysis showed that there were statistical differences in anesthesia time, operation time, prostate size and total amount of perfusion fluid between the two groups (P<0.05). Logistic analysis showed that the size of prostate was the independent risk factor of perioperative hypothermia (P<0.05). Patients were further divided according to prostate size. For patients with prostate < 80 g, the size of prostate was the independent risk factor of perioperative hypothermia (P<0.05), while for patients with prostate ≥ 80 g, the amount of perfusion fluid was the independent risk factor (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 Perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing transurethral thulium laser prostatectomy is related to the anesthesia time, operation time, prostate size and total amount of perfusion fluid. It is necessary to evaluate the risk factors before operation and take effective thermal insulation measures.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate transport efficiency and safety by process management during the handover of patients with tracheal intubation post-operation. Methods Prospective studies were performed between patients with or without process management during the handover. The time of handover were recorded and compared. The difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation were also recorded and compared. The adverse events during the handover were also investigated. Results It costed less time in the handover of patients under process management with significant difference[(4.75±0.54) min vs. (7.05±0.88) min, t=-17.21, P<0.01]. The incidence rate of harmful cases in the handover of patients under process management was significantly declined than that without process management[ 1.67%(1/60) vs. 13.33%(8/60),Χ2=4.324 3,P<0.05 ]. Conclusions Process management may facilitate the handover of patients with tracheal intubation post-operation and improve its safety.